Christian Sarcuni et al v bZx DAO et al - No. 3:2022cv00618 - Document 49 (S.D. Cal. 2023)

Sarcuni v bZx DAO (2023) explores liability within Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs), highlighting legal challenges in defining DAO membership as a general partnership and addressing security negligence in crypto protocols leading to substantial financial losses.

Christian Sarcuni et al v bZx DAO et al - No. 3:2022cv00618 - Document 49 (S.D. Cal. 2023)
This post critically analyses the case of Sarcuni et al v bZx DAO et al, focusing on its legal issues, material facts, judgment, legal principles and the legal reasoning.

🏛️ Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
🗓️ Initial Judgment Date: 2 May 2022
🗂️ Case Number: No. 3:2022cv00618 - Document 49 (S.D. Cal. 2023)
📍 Jurisdiction: United States

The Sarcuni v bZx DAO lawsuit questions the applicability of established partnership laws to DAOs and their constituents.

Sarcuni v bZx DAO assesses whether DAO members, akin to general partners due to their token holdings, bear collective liability for negligence, particularly when such oversight results in substantial financial losses.

This litigation highlights the intersection between blockchain technology and established legal principles, prompting a reevaluation of liability, governance, and operational security within decentralised finance (DeFi).

Read the full story

Sign up now to read the full story and get access to all posts for subscribers only.

Subscribe
Already have an account? Sign in

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Technology Law.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.