This post critically analyses the case of Sarcuni et al v bZx DAO et al, focusing on its legal issues, material facts, judgment, legal principles and the legal reasoning.
🏛️ Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
🗓️ Initial Judgment Date: 2 May 2022
🗂️ Case Number: No. 3:2022cv00618 - Document 49 (S.D. Cal. 2023)
📍 Jurisdiction: United States
Legal Issues
The Sarcuni v bZx DAO lawsuit questions the applicability of established partnership laws to DAOs and their constituents.
Sarcuni v bZx DAO assesses whether DAO members, akin to general partners due to their token holdings, bear collective liability for negligence, particularly when such oversight results in substantial financial losses.
This litigation highlights the intersection between blockchain technology and established legal principles, prompting a reevaluation of liability, governance, and operational security within decentralised finance (DeFi).
Read the full story
Sign up
now to read the full story and get access to all posts for
subscribers only.
Subscribe