German Federal Court of Justice Rules on Liability of Online Platforms for User-Generated Content

In a key legal decision, the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH) has clarified the extent to which online platforms can be held liable for user-generated content that infringes upon third-party rights.

This ruling impacts digital service providers operating in Germany and potentially across the European Union.​

Background of the Case

The case originated from a dispute between a rights holder and an online platform that allows users to upload and share content.

The plaintiff alleged that certain user-uploaded materials infringed upon their intellectual property rights and sought to hold the platform operator liable for these infringements.

The central question before the court was whether the platform could be considered directly responsible for the infringing content posted by its users.​

Court's Analysis and Decision

The BGH examined the role of the platform operator in relation to the user-generated content. The court emphasised that while platforms provide the technical means for content dissemination, they do not inherently endorse or control the material uploaded by users.

Therefore, the mere provision of a platform does not automatically result in direct liability for user actions.​

However, the court delineated circumstances under which a platform could be held liable:​

1. Knowledge of Infringement: If the platform operator is made aware of specific infringing content and fails to act expeditiously to remove or disable access to it, they may be held liable.​
2. Duty of Care: Platforms are expected to implement reasonable measures to prevent the dissemination of infringing content, especially if they have reason to believe that their service is being used for unlawful activities.​
3. Active Role: If the platform takes an active role in promoting, curating, or otherwise influencing the content, it may be deemed to have a greater degree of responsibility.​

The court concluded that in this specific case, the platform operator did not have direct knowledge of the infringing content prior to notification and had procedures in place to address such issues, thereby limiting their liability.​

Implications for Online Platforms

This ruling provides clarity for online service providers regarding their obligations concerning user-generated content:​

• Proactive Monitoring Not Required: Platforms are not obligated to proactively monitor all user content for potential infringements, which would be a burdensome and impractical requirement.​
• Responsive Action Necessary: Upon receiving notification of specific infringements, platforms must act promptly to remove or restrict access to the content to avoid liability.​
• Implementation of Preventative Measures: While not mandated to monitor all content, platforms should have systems in place to deter and address unlawful use of their services.​

This decision aligns with the principles established in the European Union's E-Commerce Directive, which provides a liability exemption for intermediary service providers under certain conditions.​

Reactions from Stakeholders

The ruling has elicited varied responses from different sectors:​

• Digital Rights Advocates: Supporters of internet freedom view the decision as a balanced approach that protects platforms from undue liability while still upholding the rights of content creators.​
• Content Creators and Rights Holders: Some rights holders express concern that the ruling may not go far enough in compelling platforms to prevent the spread of infringing content, potentially impacting their revenues and intellectual property rights.​
• Legal Experts: Legal professionals note that the decision provides much-needed guidance on the application of existing laws to the digital environment and may influence future legislation and court rulings within the EU.​

For more insights and updates on legal developments in the digital realm, subscribe to our newsletter and stay informed.