The European Commission and the European Board for Digital Services support a revised Code of Conduct to counter illegal hate speech online. Integrated with the Digital Services Act, it mandates stricter reporting, monitoring, and transparency from online platforms.
South Korea’s Fair Trade Commission has initiated a consent resolution with Kakao over allegations of unfair supplier practices on its platform. The investigation revealed increased supplier costs linked to mandatory delivery models and higher commission fees.
France’s Data Protection Authority has released new guidelines for integrating SDKs into mobile apps. The rules clarify data privacy responsibilities, require explicit user consent, and mandate strong security measures to ensure GDPR compliance and protect user information.
Harris as Next Friend of RNH v Adams (2024) raised critical questions about liability in the context of artificial intelligence's role in decision-making. The case examined human responsibility and machine influence, addressing the legal implications of integrating AI systems in professional duties.
🏛️ Court: U.S. District Court, D. Massachusetts
🗓️ Initial Judgment Date: 20 November 2024
🗂️ Citation: 24-CV-12437-PGL, 2024 WL 4843837
📍 Jurisdiction: United States
The case of Harris as next friend of RNH v Adams brought to light several core legal issues that intersected the realms of artificial intelligence, professional accountability, and the boundaries of liability.
At its core, the dispute revolved around whether reliance on an AI system in a professional setting could diminish or alter the standard of care owed to individuals affected by decisions stemming from that reliance.
One of the central issues was whether the defendant's use of AI introduced a break in the chain of causation. The argument presented was that AI, as a non-human actor, should bear some responsibility for errors or outcomes influenced by its decision-making algorithms.
![Getty Images (US) Inc v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 38 (Ch)](/content/images/size/w30/2025/01/Getty-Images--US--Inc-v-Stability-AI-Ltd--2025--EWHC-38--Ch--1.jpeg)
In Getty Images (US) Inc v Stability AI Ltd (2025), the court examined whether Stability AI unlawfully used Getty Images’ copyrighted works to train its AI models. Getty Images argued that Stability AI’s data scraping and reproduction of protected images constituted copyright infringement.
Sarcuni v bZx DAO (2023) explores liability within Decentralised Autonomous Organisations (DAOs), highlighting legal challenges in defining DAO membership as a general partnership and addressing security negligence in crypto protocols leading to substantial financial losses.
ASEAN Digital Ministers adopt an expanded AI Governance Guide addressing generative AI technologies. The guide outlines policies for transparency, accountability, and ethical development, supported by practical use cases across healthcare, finance, media, and logistics industries within the region.
The UK government’s AI Opportunities Action Plan outlines 50 targeted measures to accelerate artificial intelligence development. Key initiatives include AI Growth Zones, increased public computing capacity, and a National Data Library for accessible, high-quality datasets.
Follow the latest Tech Law news and updates about AI, Digital Assets, Internet Law, Data Protection, LegalTech.
