China's new rules on military content sharing impose tighter guidelines on what can be posted online. The rules mandate platforms to follow official sources, banning misinformation while promoting government-approved perspectives on national defence, history, and military achievements.
Both GDPR and HIPAA are key regulations focused on protecting sensitive data. GDPR applies to personal data of EU residents, while HIPAA governs healthcare data in the U.S. Organisations must comply with both for international operations.
Face recognition biometric attendance systems are transforming attendance tracking across industries, improving efficiency and accuracy. From corporate offices to remote teams, these solutions streamline processes while they must ensure compliance with privacy regulations.
As artificial intelligence generates works rivalling human creativity, debates arise about their legal protection. Should AI-created content remain unprotected in the public domain, or do we need new frameworks to balance innovation, financial incentives, and the value of human creativity?
Artificial intelligence (AI) has reached a stage where it can produce art and literature that rivals human creativity.
From paintings that mirror the brushstrokes of masters like Rembrandt to novels that almost clinch prestigious literary awards, AI is redefining what it means to be creative.
But as machine-made art continues to blur the lines between human and artificial creativity, one pressing question emerges: Who, if anyone, should own the rights to these works?
![Getty Images (US) Inc v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 38 (Ch)](/content/images/size/w30/2025/01/Getty-Images--US--Inc-v-Stability-AI-Ltd--2025--EWHC-38--Ch--1.jpeg)
In Getty Images (US) Inc v Stability AI Ltd (2025), the court examined whether Stability AI unlawfully used Getty Images’ copyrighted works to train its AI models. Getty Images argued that Stability AI’s data scraping and reproduction of protected images constituted copyright infringement.
Harris as Next Friend of RNH v Adams (2024) raised critical questions about liability in the context of artificial intelligence's role in decision-making. The case examined human responsibility and machine influence, addressing the legal implications of integrating AI systems in professional duties.
ASEAN Digital Ministers adopt an expanded AI Governance Guide addressing generative AI technologies. The guide outlines policies for transparency, accountability, and ethical development, supported by practical use cases across healthcare, finance, media, and logistics industries within the region.
The UK government’s AI Opportunities Action Plan outlines 50 targeted measures to accelerate artificial intelligence development. Key initiatives include AI Growth Zones, increased public computing capacity, and a National Data Library for accessible, high-quality datasets.
Follow the latest Tech Law news and updates about AI, Digital Assets, Internet Law, Data Protection, LawTech.
